Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21430 (JHR)

AZAD PAL ALIAS BOBBY PAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./6584/2026 · 2026-07-22

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:21670 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6584 of 2026 ------ Azad Pal @ Bobby Pal, aged about 27 years, son of Ram Kripal Pal, resident of near Khatal, Rahargora, P.O. & P.S.- Parsudih, Jamshedpur, Dist.-East Singhbhum … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Manoj Kr. Mishra, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.03 Dated- 22.07.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Parsudih P.S. Case No.33 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Section 61(2), 310(4), 310(5), 111(2)(b), 111(4) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-B) (a), 25(6), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was preparing to commit dacoity. It is next submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted that one live cartridge has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and he has been arrayed as an accused on the basis of his self-confessional statement and the statement made by the co-accused persons. It is also submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.04.2026 as has been mentioned from para-20 of this bail application. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 16.06.2026 in B.A. No.5303 of 2026. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur in connection with Parsudih P.S. Case No.33 of 2026 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 22.07.2026 Gunjan-