Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21427 (CHH)

GAJENDRA KASHYAP v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2587/2026 · 2026-06-15

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23937 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2587 of 2026 1 - Gajendra Kashyap S/o Shri Dhanurjay Kashyap Aged About 37 Years R/o H. No. 117/1, Ward No. 07, Singhanpur, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Cooperative Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur, (C.G.). 2 - The Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, (C.G.). 3 - The Collector Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). 4 - The Primary Agricultural Credit Cooperative Society Singhanpur, Through Authorized Officer, Registration No. 882, Block Basna, District Mahasamund, (C.G.). 5 - The Primary Agricultural Credit Cooperative Society Kharora, Through Authorized Officer, Registration No. 1275, Block Basna, District Mahasamund, (C.G.). RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 6 - Lalit Choudhary, Posted As Samiti In-Charge At The Primary Agricultural Credit Cooperative Society Kharora, Registration No. 1275, Block Basna, District Mahasamund, (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Siddharth Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/ State : Mr. Rajkumar Gupta, Addl. A.G. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 16/06/2026 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, thereby directing Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 to forthwith implement the approved transfer of Respondent No.6 from Kharora Society to Singhanpur Society and handover the charge of Respondent No. 4 Society to Respondent No.6; 10.2 That, any other relief/order which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including award of the costs of the petition, may be given.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the competent authority by filing an 3 appropriate representation/application before the concerned Collector for redressal of the grievances raised herein. It is further submitted that the petitioner shall file a comprehensive application along with all relevant documents before the concerned Collector, and, in the event such an application is filed, this Court may be pleased to direct the concerned Collector to consider and decide the same strictly in accordance with law, after affording the petitioner an adequate opportunity of hearing, by passing a reasoned and speaking order, within a reasonable and time-bound period. 3. No objection has been raised from other side. 4. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty in favour of the petitioner to approach the competent authority by filing an appropriate representation/application before the concerned Collector for redressal of the grievances raised herein, and if such an application is filed before the concerned Collector, the concerned Collector is directed to decide the same in accordance with law within a period of 3 months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat