Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21425 (JHR)

RAMJAN HUSSAIN ALIAS CHAUDHARY v. THE STATE OFJHARKHAND

B.A./5769/2026 · 2026-07-22

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:21740 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 5769 of 2026 Ramjan Hussain @ Chaudhary, son of late Roshan Ali … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … … Opposite Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Abhishek Kr. Dubey, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, Advocate --- 05/22.07.2026 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 01.03.2026 in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.54/2026, GR 161/2026, registered under Sections 75 (1) (i) / 76/3 (5) of Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, (charge sheet submitted and cognizance taken under Section 331 (5)/332 (C)/ 64/62/75 (2)/3 (5) of B.N.S., now pending in the court of learned C.J.M. Seraikella. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 01.03.2026. He submits that as per the F.I.R., two persons entered into the house of the victim and tried to commit rape upon her, but upon alarm, one of them fled away and another was apprehended on the spot. He submits that the person, who was apprehended has taken the name of the petitioner and his statement was recorded on 17.02.2026, and thereafter, the statement of the victim was recorded on 18.02.2026, where she took the name of the petitioner for the first time. 4. The learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer for bail. However, the aforesaid submission by the learned counsel for the petitioner is not in dispute. 5. After hearing the learned counsels for the parties and considering the fact that the name of the petitioner transpired for the first time in the confessional statement of the co-accused, who was 2026:JHHC:21740 2 apprehended on the spot and that the F.I.R. was lodged thereafter, and subsequently the victim also named the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Seraikella in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.54/2026, GR 161/2026, on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of even single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned trial court. 6. The instant application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. 7. Let a copy of this order be communicated to the learned court concerned through “FAX/email”. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Date of Order:22.07.2026 Saurav Date of Uploading:23.07.2026