Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21424 (JHR)

RAHUL KUMAR VERMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./4335/2026 · 2026-07-22

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:21709] THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4335 of 2026 ------ Rahul Kumar Verma, aged about 30 years, S/o Narsingh Prasad Verma, resident of Reliance Fresh Digwadih No. 12, Sonarpatti, Karmagora, P.O & P.S.- Jorapokhar, District-Dhanbad, (Jharkhand). .... .... …. Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party. ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Naresh Pd Thakur, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Addl. P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 22-07-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No. 220 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 331(3), 305(a) of the B.N.S. 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is a member of organized gang of criminals and committed theft of gold and silver jewelleries and cash of Rs.5,000/- as well as other valuables from the house of the informant. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused -Raju Ansari and recovery of stolen articles from the Almirah of the petitioner. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 13.09.2025 as mentioned in para-01 of the bail application. Though, charge-sheet has already been submitted, but none of the witnesses have been examined as yet. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned P.P. opposes the prayer for regular bail. Considering submissions of learned counsels and the facts as stated above, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Hence, the court below is directed to release the petitioners on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court of Additional Sessions Judge-1st Bokaro in connection with Balidih P.S. Case No. 220 of 2024 with the condition that they will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the informant or witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 22/07/2026 Amar/