JAGDISH PRASAD YOGI S/O RAMCHANDRA NATH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5419/2026 · 2026-04-20
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2142 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2142 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16585] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5419/2026 Jagdish Prasad Yogi S/o Ramchandra Nath, Aged About 53 Years, R/o Gram Rajkot, Tehsil Deoli, District Tonk, Rajasthan - 304804 ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Singh Rathor Mr. Ishan Verma Ms. Tisha Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 20/04/2026
1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.264/2025 registered at Police Station-Deoli, District-Tonk for the offences under Sections 318(4) and 316(2) of BNS, 2023 the petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 482 BNSS.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner is the cousin father-in-law of the complainant, Aarti Yogi. He contended that the main allegation has been levelled against Budhiprakash. He argued that no benefit has been passed to the present petitioner and that the petitioner is a Government servant who has been implicated with an ulterior motive. It is
[2026:RJ-JP:16585] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-5419/2026] submitted that the matter pertains to a family dispute, which is civil in nature, and in order to create pressure and derive illegal benefits, the petitioner has been falsely involved on false and concocted grounds. The petitioner is ready to cooperate with the investigation and join the investigation. No custodial interrogation is required. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the facts and nature of case and that the petitioner is ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation of the case but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the bail application of the petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 482 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioner- Jagdish Prasad Yogi S/o Ramchandra Nath, he shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise
[2026:RJ-JP:16585] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-5419/2026] to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/45