IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 15129 of 2026. Decided on : 1 st September , 2026 Vikram Singh ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ....Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Bhupender S. Thakur and Mr. Varun Thakur, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Ms. Menka Raj Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Notice. Mr. Menka Raj Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. The petitioner, at the age of 67 years, seeks to remove the alleged anomaly existing in his pay scale, vis-a-vis pay scale enjoyed by his juniors. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has preferred a representation, Annexure P-12 to respondents, but the same has not been considered and decided in accordance with law till date. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 4. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner would be content in case the respondents/competent authority(s) are directed to consider and decide the aforesaid representation in accordance with law within a fixed-time schedule. Learned Deputy Advocate General is not averse to this prayer. 5. Having regard to the afore-submissions, but without examining the merits of the matter, this writ petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents/ competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, Annexure P-12, in accordance with law and Rules/Policy governing the field within a period of six weeks from today. The decision so arrived at shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also to stand disposed of. (Jyotsna Rewal Dua) Judge 1st September, 2026. (jai)