Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21413 (DEL)

MEENU JAIN & ANR. v. KALPANA JAIN & ANR.

RC.REV./7/2026 · 2026-10-07

Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

$~18 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC011083252025 + RC.REV. 7/2026 & CM APPL. 1417/2026 (Stay) MEENU JAIN & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Jatan Singh, Senior Advocate with Mr. Siddharth Singh, Mr. C.M. Sangwan, Ms. Vanshika Adhana, Mr. Jashank Shrivastava, Ms. Nishtha Chawla and Ms. Sanjana Dayma, Advs. versus KALPANA JAIN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Appearance not given CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR O R D E R % 07.10.2026 1. The present Rent Control Revision Petition, has been filed under Section 25-B(8) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, assailing the Order dated 16.10.2025 passed by the learned Additional Rent Controller-02, Central, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Eviction Petition being RC ARC No.580/2025, whereby an Eviction Order was passed against the Petitioners herein qua the demised premises bearing shop no. 1219/09, Ground floor, Municipal No. 1217-1221, Katra Sat Narayan, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-06, as shown in red colour in the site plan. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the parties are ad idem that, since a dispute has arisen with regard to the identity of the person who This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2026 at 13:03:18 is stated to have received the summons on behalf of the Petitioners, the matter may be remanded to the learned ARC for determination as to whether the summons were duly and validly served upon the Petitioners. The learned ARC may also consider the consequential effect of such determination, including whether, in the facts and circumstances of the case, the Petitioners would be entitled to file an application seeking leave to defend. The parties are permitted to raise all such contentions in their support and adduce such documents as permissible in support of the same. 3. In view of the aforesaid consensus between the parties, the Impugned Order is hereby set aside and the matter is remanded back to the learned ARC for de novo consideration, including determination of the issue of service and its consequential effect, and thereafter proceed in accordance with law. 4. The present Petition, along with pending application(s), if any, is accordingly disposed of in the aforesaid terms. 5. List the matter before the learned ARC on 27.10.2026. HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J. OCTOBER 7, 2026/rk/ma This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2026 at 13:03:18