1 (RNT,J &MRK,J A.S. NO.3590 OF 2004) APHC010284212004 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM APPEAL SUIT NO: 3590/2004 Between: 1. D. SANDHYA RANI, W/O. GOPI BHUPESH GUPTA NAGAR BALAJI NAGAR KRISHNA LANKA ...APPELLANT AND 1. D GOPI, S/o. Nageshwar Rao R/o. 41-1/10-43, 1st Lane Nehru Nagar Krishna Lanka ...RESPONDENT Appeal against the Judgement and decree dated 29.6.2004 passed in os nO. 60/2000 on the file of Family Court Cum IV Additional district and Sessions Court, at Vijayawada. IA NO: 1 OF 2004(ASMP 13912 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pay interim maintenance of Rs.1000/- or else the deponent herein will be put to irreparable loss and hardship and pass such other order or orders Counsel for the Appellant: 1. V RAGHU Counsel for the Respondent: 1. CH RAGHU RAM 2 (RNT,J &MRK,J A.S. NO.3590 OF 2004) The Court made the following: JUDGMENT:-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 17.09.2024, the following order was passed : “None for both sides Post the matter after three (03) weeks.” 2. On 11.12.2025, the following order was passed : “At request of learned counsel for the appellant, as a last opportunity, list after two weeks.” 3. Though the appeal is listed under the caption of ‘old matters’, today also, there is no representation on either side. 4. The Appeal Suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM,J Date : 28.01.2026. RPD. 3 (RNT,J &MRK,J A.S. NO.3590 OF 2004) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM (DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION) APPEAL SUIT NO: 3590 OF 2004 Date: 28.01.2026 RPD. 4 (RNT,J &MRK,J A.S. NO.3590 OF 2004) The appeal is of the year 2009. We do not find any justified reason toadjourn the matter, particularly when the matter is shown in the caption „oldmatters‟ and also with due notice to the counsels that the old matters may notbe adjourned. 4. Inspite of opportunity given to advance the arguments, arguments were not advanced.