Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21404 (DEL)

SHRI MAHINDER KUMAR KHANNA HUF & ORS. v. MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD

ARB.P./1209/2026 · 2026-10-07

Om Prakash Shukla

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

ARB.P. 1209/2026 p. 1 $~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI # CNR No. DLHC010319352026 + ARB.P. 1209/2026 SHRI MAHINDER KUMAR KHANNA HUF & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajiv K Garg, Mr. R.K. Bedi, Mr. Mohit Bedi and Mr. Ashish Garg, Advocates. versus MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD .....Respondent Through: Ms. Leena Tuteja, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA ORDER (ORAL) % 07.10.2026 1. At the outset, learned Counsel for the Respondent submits that there is no arbitration agreement between the parties. 2. In view of the above, learned Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail alternative remedy in accordance with law. 3. Leave and liberty, as sought, is granted. 4. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, J OCTOBER 7, 2026/pa