Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010289942024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 14481/2024 Between:
1. SAPARAM SIRISHA RANI, W/O S. MANJUNATH, AGED 49 YEARS, R/O H.NO.23-10-70/5B, ROYAL NAGAR, 7 TH CROSS ROAD, TIRUPATI-5217501.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (ENDOWMENT) DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH-52223.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH,
VIJAYAWADA, OPPOSITE S.GRAND RESTAURANT, ONE CENTRE, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, AP-
521225.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF ENDOWMENTS, O/O ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in directing conduction of enquiry by 3rd Respondent issued in proceedings Rc.No.M1/COE-19027
(44)/1/ 2023, dt. 01-07-2024 (Ex.P5) and consequently proceedings of 3 rd Respondent in issuing notice of enquiry in ENDOW- ADMNOMISC/ 222/2024-JA(B4)-ENDTSKNL/Dated 04-07-2024 (Ex.P6) as illegal, devoid of jurisdiction, excess of its powers, colourable, unilateral, prejudicial, violative of principles of natural justice, overreaching the principles of autonomy and democratic functioning of the Smt. Panguluri Seethammagari Arya Vysya Dharma Satram, Tirupati or else there is breach of fundamental right of administration of Smt. Panguluri Seethammagari Arya Vysya Dharma Satram, Tirupati and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the proceedings of 2nd Respondent vide Rc.No.M1/COE-19027 (44) / 1/ 2023, dt. 01-07-2024 (Ex.P5) directing the 3rd respondent to conduct the enquiry and the proceedings of 3rd Respondent vide ENDOW- ADMN0MISC/222/2024-JA(B4)-ENDTSKNL/Dated 04-07-2024 (EX.P6) issuing notice of enquiry pending disposal of the writ petition or else the Trust will suffer irreparable loss and hardship and pass just and appropriate orders.
IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
order permitting the proposed Respondent no. 4 to implead and come on record as - Respondent No. 4 in the present Writ Petition No. 14481 of 2024, enabling to make appropriate applications / counter in the present proceedings, in the interest of justice and fair play and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. J UGRANARASIMHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
ORDER:- The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking the following relief:
“to issue any writ or order more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in directing conduction of enquiry by 3rd Respondent issued in proceedings Rc.No.M1/COE-19027 (44)/1/ 2023, dt. 01-07-2024 (Ex.P5) and consequently proceedings of 3 rd Respondent in issuing notice of enquiry in ENDOW-ADMNOMISC/ 222/2024-JA(B4)-ENDTSKNL/Dated 04-07-2024 (Ex.P6) as illegal, devoid of jurisdiction, excess of its powers, colourable, unilateral, prejudicial, violative of principles of natural justice, overreaching the principles of autonomy and democratic functioning of the Smt. Panguluri Seethammagari Arya Vysya Dharma Satram, Tirupati or else there is breach of fundamental right of administration of Smt. Panguluri Seethammagari Arya Vysya Dharma Satram, Tirupati and pass…”
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed a letter seeking permission of this Court to withdraw this Writ Petition.
4. Permission is accorded.
5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
Date: 29.01.2026 M K K
268 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION.No.14481 of 2024
Date: 29.01.2026 M K K