Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21403 (KAR)

THIMMAPPA v. C P SUNDAR RAJ

RSA/782/2022 · 2026-06-09

V Srishananda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27646 RSA No. 782 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 782 OF 2022 (INJ) BETWEEN: 1. THIMMAPPA S/O KENCHAPPA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS 2. VEENA D/O THIMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS 3. LAKSHMI D/O THIMMAPPA AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS 4. VASU S/O LATE VENKATRAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 5. INDIRAMMA D/O VENKATARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS 6. PUTTALAKSHMI W/O MANJUNATHA AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 7. JYOTHI D/O SEETHARAMA AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27646 RSA No. 782 of 2022 8. SMT. GANGAMMA W/O. CHIKKANNA NARASIPURA VILLAGE KANAKATTI HOBLI ARISIKARE TALUK THE APPELLANTS NO.1 TO 8 ARE R/O. NEAR MALLIGAMMA TEMPLE DURAGUDI BEEDHI ARSIKERE - 573 103 9. SMT. LAXMIDEVAMMA W/O. VENKATARAMAIAH AGED MAJOR R/O. NIDAGATTA VILLAGE SAKARAYAPATTNA HOBLI KADUR TALUK …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. H.R. PRASANNA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. C P SUNDAR RAJ S/O LATE C V PUTTANNA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS R/A SRI KARTHIK, IST CROSS HOSAMANE EXTENSION SHIMOGA CITY - 58023 2. CHANNABASAPA S/O MALLAPA K.T., AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS BARBERS RUDRAGUDI ROAD ARASIKERE - 573 103 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. R. RANGASWAMY, ADVOCATE FOR C/R1) - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27646 RSA No. 782 of 2022 THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.02.2022 PASSED IN RA NO.27/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARASIKERE, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 14.02.2017 PASSED IN OS.NO.299/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, ARASIKERE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT None appears for the appellants. Office objections are not complained. Cost imposed by the Court is also not paid. As such left with no alternative, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 65