( 2026:JHHC:21581 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3150 of 2026 1. Bisheshwar Karmali, son of Sri Govind Karmali, aged about 42 years 2. Govind Karmali, son of late Beni Karmali, aged about 75 years, SI. No. 1 and 2 both, residents of village Hesal, P.O.and P.S. Angara, District-Ranchi ...... … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners :Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Amria Kumari, A.P.P. 02/ 22.07.2026: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Angara P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025, registered under sections 103(1) and 3 (5) of BNS, pending in the Court of learned J.M., Ranchi. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is brother-in-law and petitioner no.2 is father-in-law of the deceased and so far as these petitioners are concerned, there are general and omnibus allegations against the petitioners of killing the deceased. He next submits that there is direct allegation against the husband of the deceased namely Dineshwar Karmali, @ Lalu who has cut the throat of deceased and room was locked and thereafter the husband also cut his throat and subsequently he was taken to the hospital and any how his life was saved. He next submits that in petitioner no.1 informed the brother of the deceased about the incident. He next submits that the witnesses in the case diary have supported the version of the petitioners and have made allegations against the husband of the deceased and so far these petitioners are concerned, nothing has come in the case diary. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioners may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail. ( 2026:JHHC:21581 ) 4. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the case has been registered under sections 103(1) and 3 (5) of BNS and in that view of the matter the anticipatory bail of the petitioners may kindly be rejected. 5. In the case diary, it has come that the husband of the deceased has cut the throat of deceased and room was locked and thereafter also cut his throat and the room was also found to be locked which was opened by the petitioner no.1 and petitioner no.1 informed the brother of the deceased about the incident. There is direct allegation against the husband of the deceased and so far as these petitioners are concerned, there are general and omnibus allegations. 6. In the attending facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned J.M., Ranchi, in connection with Angara P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023. Dt.22.07.2026 ( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-