Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21401 (AP)

Sri R.M. Ramesh Babu v. Dr. N. Sudhakar

CC/1423/2012 · 2026-03-31

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010287062012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1423/2012 Between: 1. SRI R.M. RAMESH BABU,, S/O NARAYYA, OCCUPATION: PROGRAM ASSISTANT/ FARM MANAGER, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SMT. M. PADMAJA,, W/O VENKATESWARLU, OCCUPATION : SUBJECT MATTER SPECIALIST (HOME SCIENCE), AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDENT OF STAFF QUARTERS, KRISHI VIGNANA KENDRA VINAYASHRARNAM, KAVURU VILLAGE, CHERUKUPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. SMT. N.V. RAGHAVA,, W/O NAGESWARA RAO, OCCUPATION: SUBJECT MATTER SPECIALIST (EXTENSION), AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, RESIDENT OF CHERUKUPALLI VILLAGE & MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. SMT. P. KRISHNA KUMARI,, W/O RAMESH BABU, OCCUPATION : PROGRAM ASSISTANT (HOME SCIENCE), AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KAVURU VILLAGE, CHERUKUPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. SRI M. SUVARNA RAJU,, S/O DAYA RATNAM, OCCUPATION: PROGRAM ASSISTANT (AUDIO VISUAL AIDS), AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KATTIVARAM, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. SRI V. RATNA PRAKASH,, S/O MOHANA RAO, OCCUPATION: PROGRAM ASSISTANT (FISHERIES), AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, RESIDENT OF BELLAMVARIPALEM, NAGARAM MANDAL, 2 GUNTUR DISTRICT. 7. SRI P. MOHAN SIVA PRASAD,, S/O SATYANARAYANA, OCCUPATION: JUNIOR STENOGRAPHER, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, RESIDENT OF TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 8. SMT. M. REKHA RANI,, W/O R.A. KHAN, OCCUPATION: CLERK- CUM-TYPIST, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, RESIDENT OF CHANDOL, P.V. PALEM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 9. SRI K. VARA PRASAD,, S/O KOTESWARA RAO, OCCUPATION: COOK, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDENT OF STAFF QUARTERS, KRISHI VIGNANA KENDRA VINAYASHRAMAM, KAVURU VILLAGE, CHERUKUPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 10. SRI M. SAMBASIVA RAO,, S/O HANUMANTHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCCUPATION : FARM ATTENDANT, RESIDENT OF KAVURU VILLAGE, CHERUKUPALLI MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 11. SRI K. SRINIVASULU,, S/O VENKATESWARALU, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, OCCUPATION : FIELD ATTENDANT, RESIDENT OF AMRUTHAVELU VILLAGE & MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. DR N SUDHAKAR, S/o. late Sri N. Narasimha Rao, Zonal Project Director, Zonal Project Directorate, Zone V, CRIDA Campus, Santoshnagar, Hyderabad. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the Respondent herein for violating the order of this Hontle Court made in W.P.M.P.No.10844 of 2010 in W.P. No. 8156 of 2010 dated 29/04/2010 under Sec.10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act; and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2012(APPL 890 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent to pay salaries from February 2012 to August 2012 and 3 to continue to pay the salaries every month to the petitioners forthwith pending disposal of the above contempt case and to pass IA NO: 2 OF 2012(APPL 5484 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2013(APPL 794 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the proposed petitioners to come on record as petitioner Nos. 12&13 in C.C.No.1423 of 2012 being legal representatives of the deceased 9th petitioner and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P VENUGOPAL Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. RAJA SHEKAR RAO SALVAJI The Court made the following: 4 ORDER: 1. It is submitted that Writ Petition No.8156 of 2010 and batch were disposed of by this Court by an order dated 27.09.2018. In view of the said order and the disposal of the writ petitions, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt proceedings. 2. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that nothing further remains for adjudication, the present contempt case stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:01.04.2026 PNS