Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 214 (JHR)

SANDEEP KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cr.M.P./649/2026 · 2026-03-20

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:JHHC:7962 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI CrMP no. 649 of 2026 Sandeep Kumar, aged about 29 years son of, Basant Paswan, resident of Village-Bariyatu, P.O- Bariyatu, P.S-Balumath, Dist- Latehar, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sarita Kumari, aged about 20 years, daughter of Jitendra Oraon, resident of village- Nawatotli, Kudu, P.O.- Nawatotli, P.S.- Kudu, Dist.- Lohardaga, Jharkhand … Opp. parties Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kr. Mehta , Adv. For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda , Addl. PP For OP No.2 : Mr. Rajesh Bhusan, Advocate 02 / 20.03.2026 Heard the parties. This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed at the instance of the petitioners for restoration of ABA No. 2178 of 2025 to its original file. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the ABA No. 2178 of 2025 was rejected as not pressed vide order dated 08.04.2025 and then vide order dated 19.12.2025 passed in CrMP No. 2950 of 2025, ABA No. 2178 of 2025 was restored subject to filing of proof of payment of cost of Rs. 10,000/- by the petitioner to the opp. Party no. 2 through his counsel appearing in the record with two weeks but due to inadvertence the same could not be complied in time. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the said cost has already been paid to the opp. Party no. 2 through his counsel appearing in the record. It is further submitted that the petitioner has very good grounds to agitate in this case and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that ABA No. 2178 of 2025 be restored to its original file. Learned Addl. P.P. and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 have no serious objection to the prayer of restoration. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, ABA No. 2178 of 2025 is restored to its original file to the stage, at which, it was before its dismissal. List ABA No. 2178 of 2025 after a week. This criminal miscellaneous petition is disposed of accordingly. (ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY, J.) Dated 20.03.2026 Smita/-