1 / 3 2026:CGHC:24167 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 1005 of 2022 Ramkhelawan @ Ramkhilawan Kewat S/o Shri Munshiram Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Budhikhar, Post Malhar, Police Station And Tahsil Masturi, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Pankaj Dahire The Then Sub Divisional Officer (Rev.), Masturi, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, Presently Posted As Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sakti, District Sakti Chhattisgarh 2 - Amit Gupta In-Charge Sub Divisional Officer (Rev. ), Masturi, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Gomti Bhaina S/o Shri Shyam Swaroop Bhaina, Sarpanch, Village Panchayat Budhikhar, Police Station And Tahsil Masturi, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 4 - Shyam Swaroop Bhaina S/o Shri Sadaku Bhaina Aged About 30 Years R/o Village Budhikhar, Police Station And Tahsil Masturi, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Posted As Secretary Village Panchayat Bhurkura And Loharsi (Son), Police Station Pachpedi, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 5 - Manoj Thawait S/o Shri Ramgopal @ Pora, Up Sarpanch, Village Digitally signed by PRAVEEN KUMAR SINHA Date: 2026.06.17 11:01:05 +0530 2 / 3 Panchayat Budhikhar Police Station And Tahsil Masturi, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh 6 - Gajanand Thawait S/o Shri Melauram Thawait Aged About 28 Years R/o Village Budhikhar, Police Station And Tahsil Masturi, Civil And Revenue District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Paras Mani Shrivas, Advocate For Resp. No.1 : Mr. Ashish Gupta, Advocate S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board 16/06/2026 1. Learned counsel for respondent submits that this contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience of the order dated 07.09.2021 passed by this Court in WPC No.2856 of 2021 whereby this Court has directed that no forceful dispossession of the petitioners shall be carried out from the land bearing Survey No.725/1 admeasuring 5 acres and the petitioner herein is still in possession. 2. Submission made by learned counsel for the respondent with regard to possession of the petitioner over the land bearing Survey No.725/1 admeasuring 5 acres, as of now, is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. In view of submission of learned counsel for respective parties, I do not find any good ground to continue with this contempt petition any further. 3 / 3 4. Accordingly, contempt proceeding initiated against respondents is dropped. Notice issued to respondents stands discharged. 5. Contempt Petition is closed. Sd/-- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Praveen