Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21397 (CAL)

MANIK GHOSH v. THE STATE

WPA/9099/1998 · 2026-05-19

Ravi Krishan Kapur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

19.05.2026 73 Ct. No.7 Sws.M WPA/9099/1998 IA NO: CAN/1/2000(Old No:CAN/9189/2000) MANIK GHOSH VS THE STATE None appears on behalf of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for even in the second call. This matter was appearing in the Warning List and the parties had sufficient notice that the same would be taken up for hearing. There is also no adjournment prayed for on their behalf. A Report filed by the Department indicates that despite efforts, the records of this proceeding are not traceable. It also appears from the Report that the proceeding is not traceable even in the CIS as well as the available Rule Register and Movement Registers under the custody of the Mandamus Section. In view of the above, WPA 9099 of 1998 stands dismissed for default. Connected applications, if any, also stand dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. The Department is directed to take necessary steps forthwith. (Ravi Krishan Kapur, J.)