IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.40018 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2025 Thana- NADI THANA District- Darbhanga ====================================================== 1. Ranbir Yadav @ Ranvir Yadav S/o Indal Yadav Permanent R/o village - Sattour, P.S.- Darhar, District- Saharsa, at present R/o Village - Rangelipur, Baltharwa, P.S - Nadi, District - Darbhanga.. 2. Kamlesh Yadav S/o Mahendra Yadav @ Maheshwar Yadav Permanent R/o village - Sattour, P.S.- Darhar, District- Saharsa, at present R/o Village - Rangelipur, Baltharwa, P.S - Nadi, District - Darbhanga 3. Kundan Yadav @ Kundan Kumar Yadav S/o Manohar Yadav Permanent R/o village - Sattour, P.S.- Darhar, District- Saharsa, at present R/o Village - Rangelipur, Baltharwa, P.S - Nadi, District - Darbhanga.. 4. Rajnish Yadav @ Rajnish Kumar S/o Kamleshwar Yadav @ Kamo Yadav Permanent R/o village - Sattour, P.S.- Darhar, District- Saharsa, at present R/o Village - Rangelipur, Baltharwa, P.S - Nadi, District - Darbhanga.. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amarnath Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rabindra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 02-07-2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after some arguments, seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no. 2 (Kamlesh Yadav). 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn with respect to petitioner no. 2 (Kamlesh Yadav). Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40018 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026 2/3 5. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 303(2) 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no. 1 is a person with clean antecedent and petitioner nos. 3 and 4 have antecedent of one case and the informant alleges that four named women accused were cutting wood from his land, on objection, they assaulted and snatched her gold chain, further on 10-12-2025, the aforesaid four accused abused her in presence of her co-villager Dharmendar Paswan, further Indal, Rajnish, Ranvir, Kamlesh and Kundan assaulted Vinod by lathi, on account of assault by Indal, victim Vinod suffered injury on head and he was taken to hospital, further on 11-12- 2025, Ranjit along with aforesaid named accused fired and fled. 7. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant case on account of dispute relating to land. It is next submitted that Indal is not a petitioner in the instant case and as far as petitioners are concerned, the allegations against them are general and omnibus in nature. 8. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.40018 of 2026(2) dt.02-07-2026 3/3 anticipatory bail of the petitioners. 9. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioner nos. 1, 3 and 4 above- named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Nadi P.S. Case No. 10 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the BNSS. Sumit/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T