Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21379 (BOM)

SEAN TEDDY SEREAO v. NISHITH PATEL AND ANR.

APEAL/110/2015 · 2026-01-17

Shri Shivkumar Dige

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

96-APEAL-110-2015.doc N.S.Kamble IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 110 OF 2015 Sean Teddy Sereao … Appellant Versus Nishith Patel And Anr. … Respondents ________________________________________________________ Mr.Om Latpate i/b Mr.Prashat Badole, for the Appellant. Mr.S.S. Pednekar, APP for Respondent No.2-State. ________________________________________________________ CORAM : SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J. DATE : 17th JANUARY, 2026 P.C. : . Heard learned counsel for Applicant and learned APP for the Respondent No.2-State. 2. Learned counsel for Appellant on instructions seeks leave to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file appeal before the learned Sessions Court as per the view of the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case Celestium Financial Vs. Ghanasekaran Etc.1 3. Considering the submission of learned counsel for Appellant, 1 (2005) SC 2099. p. 2 NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Digitally signed by NILAM SANTOSH KAMBLE Date: 2026.01.20 11:31:05 +0530 96-APEAL-110-2015.doc N.S.Kamble Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. 4. Appeal is dismissed and disposed of as withdrawn. 5. Learned Sessions Court shall consider the delay, if appeal is filed as application was pending before this Court. (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)