IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.42358 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-195 Year-2026 Thana- KHUSRUPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Mozahid Gani @ Muzahid Gani @ Mozahid Goni Son of Mujaj Ali Jabbar Resident of Village- Lodipur, P.S.- Khushrupur, Dist- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 29-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Khushrupur P.S. Case No. 195/2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of B.N.S. and Section 27 of Arms Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, the deceased was killed by unknown criminals for dispute over 25 kathas of land. The name of the persons who are involved in the conspiracy of killing the deceased have been mentioned in the FIR. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case Learned counsel further submits that he has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 08.04.2026. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.42358 of 2026(2) dt.29-06-2026 2/2 5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner and submitted that during the course of investigation, it transpired that the petitioner had earlier demanded that the deceased to transfer five kathas of land to him. Upon the deceased's refusal, he allegedly received threats from an unknown mobile number. The deceased had recorded the threatening call, and the investigation revealed that the person issuing the threats was the petitioner. It is further submitted that an earlier firing incident targeting the deceased had been captured by the CCTV cameras installed at the petitioner's premises. However, despite being requested during the investigation, the petitioner refused to provide the CCTV footage. Lastly, learned APP submitted that the investigation has disclosed the petitioner's involvement in a criminal conspiracy leading to the murder of the deceased, thereby establishing his complicity in the alleged offence. 6. Considering the materials available on record, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T