1 2026:CGHC:23785 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCRC No. 4731 of 2026 Dinesh Bunkar S/o Late Sukhsagar Bunkar Aged About 27 Years R/o Forest Colony Kondagaon, P.S. and District - Kondagaon (C.G.) ... Applicant versus State of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Kondagaon District Kondagaon (C.G.) ... Non-Applicant For Applicant : Mr. Pravin Kumar Tulsyan, Advocate. For Non-Applicant/State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board 15.06.2026 1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 61/2026 registered at Police Station – Kondagaon, District - Kondagaon (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act. 2. As per the prosecution case, the Excise Department, Circle Kondagaon, District Kondagaon (C.G.), allegedly seized 171 bulk litres of foreign- made liquor from the possession of the present applicant. The applicant was subsequently arrested, and thereafter the prosecution filed the charge-sheet before the competent Court PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2026.06.16 18:19:55 +0530 2 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. He also submits that the applicant has two previous criminal antecedents, one under the Indian Penal Code and the other under the Excise Act. It is further submitted that the co-accused, namely, Nihal Singh Bhatia has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 28.04.2026 passed in MCRC No. 2725/2026, further the charge-sheet has already been filed in the present case and that the applicant has been in judicial custody since 24.02.2026. Learned Counsel argues that under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, the prescribed punishment ranges from a minimum of one year to a maximum of three years, and that the conclusion of the trial is likely to take a considerable amount of time. In light of the aforesaid circumstances, it is prayed that this Court may be pleased to grant regular bail to the applicant on the ground of parity. 4. On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail application and submits that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the present case. However, he could not dispute the fact that other co-accused person, who are similarly situated, has already been granted bail by this Court. He further submits that the applicant has two criminal antecedents, one under the Indian Penal Code and the other under the Excise Act. 5. I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary. 6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the nature and gravity of the allegations levelled against the applicant, and the co-accused, namely, Nihal Singh Bhatia has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 28.04.2026 passed in MCRC No. 2725/2026, 3 further the charge-sheet has already been filed in the present case and that the applicant has been in judicial custody since 24.02.2026, and the applicant has two previous criminal antecedents, one under the Indian Penal Code and the other under the Excise Act, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in the present case. 7. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant - Dinesh Bunkar, involved in Crime No. 61/2026 registered at Police Station – Kondagaon, District - Kondagaon (C.G.), for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law. (ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 269 of BNS. (iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 84 of BNSS is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the Court on 4 the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 209 of BNS. (iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 351 of BNSS. If in the opinion of the trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law. 8. Office is directed to send a certified copy of this order to the trial Court for necessary information and compliance forthwith. - Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti