Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2135 (BOM)

ASHOK BAPURAO LAGAD v. BALAJI RAMBHAU LAGAD AND OTHERS

CA/9330/2026 · 2026-08-20

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 1 ) 990 ca 9330.06 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 990 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 9330 OF 2026 IN SAST/25175/2026 ASHOK BAPURAO LAGAD VERSUS BALAJI RAMBHAU LAGAD AND OTHERS ….. Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Chaudhari Nitin Keshavrao ….. CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 20.08.2026 P.C.:- 1. Leave to correct the addresses of respondents in both second appeal and civil application. Leave granted. Necessary amendment be carried out within a week. Civil Application for delay: 2. This is an application for condonation of delay of 56 days caused in filing the appeal. 3. Perused the application. Heard the learned advocate for applicant. 4. On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay 2026:BHC-AUG:37723 ( 2 ) 990 ca 9330.06 deserves to be condoned, subject to removal of office objections. If office objections are not removed within two weeks this application shall be deemed to be dismissed. 5. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice, subject to removal of office objections Appeal: 6. Issue notice to the respondents, returnable on 08.10.2026. Call record and proceedings. [SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.] mubashir