Amrendra kumar @ Amrendra Paswan @ Amrendra Kumar Paswan @ Armendra v. The State of Bihar
CR. MISC./41516/2026 · 2026-06-25
Sandeep Kumar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21349 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21349 (PAT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.41516 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-208 Year-2025 Thana- VISHNUPAD District- Gaya ====================================================== Amrendra kumar @ Amrendra Paswan @ Amrendra Kumar Paswan @ Armendra Son of Brahamanand Paswan @ Varmanand Paswan Resident of Mohalla- Ram Sagar Tank (west), P.S.- Vishnupad, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Kumar No. 2, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 25-06-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Vishnupad P.S. Case No. 208/2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 191(2)/ 190/ 126(2)/ 115(2)/ 118(1)/ 117(2)/ 118(2)/ 329(3)/ 76/ 308(2)/ 303(2)/ 109 of B.N.S.
3. As per the prosecution case, petitioner, along with the other accused persons, is alleged to have demanded extortion money from the informant's uncle and threatened that, if the demanded amount was not paid within a week, the informant's family would be killed.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in the case. Learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.41516 of 2026(2) dt.25-06-2026 2/2 counsel further submits that he has two criminal antecedents and he is in custody since 21.03.2026. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in the case/ trial.
5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the allegations levelled against the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
7. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed.
tusharika/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T