APHC010275682024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3397] TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENUTHURUMALLI GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 406/2024 Between: 1.N. KALAVATHI,, W/O LATE N. MUNEENDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O TUDA PLOTS, TIRUPATHI. 2.N. RAJAKAMAL,, S/O LATE N. MUNEENDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, R/O TUDA PLOTS, TIRUPATHI. 3.M. KOTESWARA REDDY,, S/O LATE MUNEENDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 24 YEARS, R/O TUDA PLOTS, TIRUPATHI. 4.SAHITHI KUMARI,, D/O N. MUNEENDRA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/O TUDA PLOTS, TIRUPATHI. ...APPELLANT(S) AND 1.SMT M MALLIKA, W/O LATE CHANDRA BABU, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 2-2-332, CHINTHAKAYALA STREET, TIRUPATHI. 2.S SAILAJA, W/O PADMANABHAM, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, R/O D. NO. 2-2-332, CHINTHAKAYALA STREET, TIRUPATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal under section ___________ against ordersThe appellants beg to present the above second appeal against decree and judgment dt.09-10-2020 in A.S. No. 64 of 2014 on the file of V Additional District Jidge, Tirupathi confirmed the Decree and Judgment dt.07-07-2014 in O.S. No. 1218 of 2007 on the file of Hon'ble Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tirupathi IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to Condone delay 764 days in filing the Second Appeal against Decree and Judgment dt.09-10-2020 in A.S. No. 64 of 2014 on the file of V Additional District Judge, Tirupathi and pass IA NO: 2 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with the filing of certified copy of Decree and Judgments in O.S. No. 1218 of 2007 on the file of Hon'ble Principal Civil Judge, Junior Division, Tirupathi and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant an injunction restraining the respondents not to alienate the Suit Schedule Property as mentioned in the annexure in O.S. No. 1218 of 2007 on the file of Hon'ble Principal Civil Judge, Junior Division, Tirupathi, pending disposal of the above Second appeal and pass Counsel for the Appellant(S): 1.P GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.PAWAN KUMAR MALAPATI The Court made the following: THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO SECOND APPEAL No.406 of 2024 JUDGMENT: Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing on both sides is present. 2. Ms. Sree Deepthi, learned counsel representing on behalf of Mr. P. Gangarami Reddy, learned counsel for the appellants submitted that that matter has been settled outside of the Court between both the parties. She further submitted that they have also addressed a letter dated 29.12.2025, to the Registry to withdraw the present appeal and the same reflected in the cause list. She also endorsed the grounds of the appeal that they intend to withdraw the present appeal. 3. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the appellants, the Second Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE V.GOPALA KRISHNA RAO Date: 06.01.2026 CVD