- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27633 RSA No. 1513 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1513 OF 2019 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI CHANDRANNA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS W/O CHANNAPPA 2. SMT. YASHODAMMA AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS W/O LATE CHANDRANNA (APPELLANT NOS.1 AND 2 ARE R/OF DEVARAMARIKUNTE, CHALLAKERE TALUK, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT – 577 522. 3. SMT. OBAKKA AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS W/O BHARATHESH R/OF KOMARANAHALLI VILLAGE TALYA HOBLI, HOLALKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT – 577 526. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI RAMA BHAT K, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT JAYAMMA AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS W/O LATE SANNA BORANNA 2. SMT. BHAGYAMMA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS W/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA, Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27633 RSA No. 1513 of 2019 3. SRI. H. RAMESH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA 4. SRI. H. CHANNAPPA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA 5. SRI. H. DEEPAK AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS S/O LATE HANUMANTHAPPA NO.1 TO 5 ARE RESIDENTS OF PURLAHALLI VILLAGE, CHALLAKERE TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT – 577 522 6. SMT. NAGAMMA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS W/O SRIDHAR 7. SRI RAGHAVENDRA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS S/O SRIDHAR NOS.6 AND 7 ARE RESIDENTS OF OPP. KURI MARKET, N.H.4, HIRIYUR TOWN, CHITRADURGA DISTRICT-572 143. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI B.M.SIDDAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R2 TO R7; NOTICE TO R1 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.09.2018 PASSED IN R.A.NO.24/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, CHALLAKERE, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27633 RSA No. 1513 of 2019 AND DECREE DATED 16.10.2017 PASSED IN O.S.NO.138/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE, AND JMFC CHALLAKERE. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants has filed, which reads as under: “The Appellants respectfully submits that pending disposal above RSA since Final Decree Proceedings has been passed, with liberty to challenge Final Decree Proceeding Judgment, the above RSA may kindly be withdrawn with liberty to challenge the FDP in the interest of justice.” 2. Placing the memo on record, appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 113