Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21334 (AP)

TATAMURI SARALA v. KUNDETY VENKATESWARA RAO

CMA/1043/2009 · 2026-01-27

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam, Ravi Nath Tilhari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010238692009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3524] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1043/2009 Between: 1. TATAMURI SARALA, W/O KUNDETY VENKATESWARA RAO CIVIL ASSISTANT SURGEON R/O D.NO. 2-27-25, GOKUL STREET, SRINAGAR COLONY, ...APPELLANT AND 1. KUNDETY VENKATESWARA RAO, S/o Seetharamaiah Engineer R/o D.No. 23/104, Shaik-Imam Street, Ramanaidupet, ...RESPONDENT Appeal Under Section_____against orders IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CMAMP 1925 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased suspend the operation of the order and decree dated 7-9-209 in OP.NO. 39/2008 on the file of the Court of the III Addl.SeniorCviil Judge, Kakinada, pending disposal of the above appeal IA NO: 2 OF 2009(CMAMP 2344 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the stay granted by this Hon'ble Court on 0910.2009 in CMAMP 2 (RNT,J & MRK,J C.M.A. NO.1043 OF 2009) No.1925/2009 in CMA No.1043/2009 and dismiss the CMA in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CMAMP 1355 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to receive the documents as Evidence and marked the same as Exs. R.1 to R.9 in CMA.No. 1043 of 2009 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CMAMP 1854 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased allow the above CMa No.1043/2009 by setting aside the decree of divorce granted in the OP No.35/2008 dated 07.09.2009 on the file of the court of the III Addl.Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada in the interest of justice Counsel for the Appellant: 1. E V V S RAVI KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1. KAVITHA GOTTIPATI The Court made the following: JUDGMENT:-(per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari) On 24.02.2025, the following order was passed : “The respondent/husband filed petition O.P.No.39 of 2008 in the Court of the III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Kakinada, under Section 13(1)(1a) of Hindu Marriage Act, which was allowed on 07.09.2009, granting divorce. Being aggrieved, the appellant/wife preferred this Appeal. 2. By order dated 19.10.2009, an interim order was passed suspending the decree of divorce. 3. No representation for the appellant. 4. Sri.A.V.N. Yaswanth, learned counsel, appeared for the respondent. 3 (RNT,J & MRK,J C.M.A. NO.1043 OF 2009) 5. As a last opportunity, to enable the learned counsel for the appellant to appear and argue the matter, post after two weeks in the weekly cause list.” 2. Though the appeal is listed under the caption of ‘old matters’, today also, there is no representation for the appellant. 3. The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. ____________________ RAVI NATH TILHARI, J ______________________________ MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM, J Date : 28.01.2026. RPD/PBS. 4 (RNT,J & MRK,J C.M.A. NO.1043 OF 2009) THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM (DISMISSED FOR NON- PROSECUTION) CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1043 OF 2009 Date: 28.01.2026 RPD/PBS.