Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21333 (AP)

Inupasapla Appala Narsa v. Government of Andhra Pradesh

WP/32000/2013 · 2026-01-28

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010281352013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32000/2013 Between: 1. INUPASAPLA APPALA NARSA,, W/O. NOOKA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. LINGALAPALEM, NARSIPATNAM PROJECT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2. P.NAGAMANI,, W/O. KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. M.BENNAVARAM, KOTAVURATLA PROJECT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. K.ANURADHA,, W/O. SINGAM VENKAT RAO, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. GIDIJALA, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 4. PALAVALASA KUMARI,, W/O. APPANNA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. VAMAGOTTIPALEM, ANANDAPURAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 5. K.DEVUDAMMA,, W/O. RAJABABU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. VEMULAPUDI-I, NARSIPATNAM PROJECT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 6. L.V.S.S.SAROJINI,, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. VEMULAPUDI- IV, NARSIPATNAM PROJECT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 7. L.VARAHALAMMA,, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, R/O. SRIRAMPURAM, NARSIPATNAM PROJECT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 8. B.V.LAKSHMI,, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. MONDIKANDI, NARSIPATNAM PROJECT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 2 9. M.SATYAVATHI,, W/O. RAMANA, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. AMALAPURAM-I, NARSIPATNAM PROJECT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 10. G.YERRAYAMMA,, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/O. APPANNAPALEM, NARSIPATNAM PROJECT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 11. SURYAKANTAM,, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O. ANNAVARAM, KOTAVURATLA PROJECT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 12. BATTULA GRACE PRASANNA KUMARI,, W/O. SIONU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, R/O. Y.D.PETA-I, KOTAVURATLA PROJECT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 13. K.KUMARI,, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O. MADUGULOVA, KOTAVURATLA PROJECT, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 14. LAGUDU TULASI DEVI,, W/O. P.APPALA NAIDU, BALIREDDIPALEM VILLAGE, KOTAURATLA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 15. PAILA CHINNALAMMA,, W/O. RATNAKAR, RAMACHANDRAPALEM VILLAGE, KOTAURATLA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 16. P.SOBHARANI,, W/O. VENKATARAMANA, B.K.PALLIVILLAGE, KOTAURATLA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 17. PEDDAPOODI SURYAKANTHAM,, W/O. BANJARI, ANNAVARAM VILLAGE, KOTAURATLA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 18. S.NOOKARATNAM,, W/O. ANANDA RAJU, PANDURU VILLAGE, KOTAURATLA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 19. P.V.RAMALAKSHMI,, W/O. APPALANAID, PAMULAWAKA VILLAGE, KOTARATLA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 20. N.SIMHACHALAM,, W/O. RAMBABU, BODAPALEM VILLAGE, KOTAURATLA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 21. K.S.R. LAKSHMI,, W/O. M.APPALANAIDU, PAMULAVAKA,KOTAURATLAMANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3 22. A.RAMANAMMA,, W/O. L.SWAMINAIDU, BODAPALEM, KOTAURATLA MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 23. K.SATYAVATHI,, D/O. KONDAIAH, SRUNGAVARAM, NATAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 24. G.SATYAVATHI,, W/O. T.SATYANARAYANA, GALUGONDAPETA, NATAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 25. BHEEMIREDDI PADMA,, D/O. RAJUBABU, K.YELLAVARAM, NATAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 26. S.VARALAKSHMI,, W/O. SATTIBABU, NATHAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 27. V.LAKSHMAMMA,, W/O. PALLI BHASKAR RAO, UTAMALLA, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 28. L.CHANDRALEELA,, D/O. LATE KRISHNA KUMAR, SARUGUDU VILLAGE, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 29. A.AMALAVATHI,, W/O. R.SATYANARAYANA, KRC PURAM, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 30. M.MANGAMMA,, D/O. NOOKAYYA, KOTAURATLA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, VISAKHAPATNAMDISTRICT. PETITIONERS 14 TO 30 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER C.O. DT 20/2/14 IN WPMP 6148/14 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD WELFARE, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, WOMEN DEVELOPMENT AND CHILD WELFARE, HYDERABAD. 3. THE CHAIRMAN / DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM ...RESPONDENT(S): 4 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. S V R SUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR WOMEN DEV, CHILD WELFARE 2. ADDL ADVOCATE GENERAL The Court made the following: 5 ORDER:- There is no representation for the petitioners. 2. The writ petition is filed challenging the inaction on part of the respondent authorities in taking action on the representation dated 30.10.2013. 3. The Petitioners claim that the exam paper for the posts of Supervisor, Grade-II, (Anganwadi) in Zone-I (Visakhapatnam, Vijayanagaram and Srikakulam districts) was leaked and action was sought. The primary contention of the petitioners is that the exam which was scheduled on 04.08.2013 was postponed to 27.10.2013 and that the exam was conducted in 14 centres in Visakhapatnam. On the same day, in some centres, examination was postponed to 03.00 p.m. and in some centres, examination had commenced at 11.00 a.m. The petitioner claims that the paper was leaked in the centres where examination was conducted at 03.00 p.m. On these grounds, the present petition is filed. 4. The Learned Assistant Government Pleader submits that the recruitment in pursuance of the notification was completed and subsequently, the appointment orders were issued to the successful candidates. Recording the same, nothing further survives to be adjudicated on minutes. 6 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date.29.01.2026 SR