APHC010279252017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2244/2017 Between: 1. M/S.SANDHYA MINERAL WATER, TIRUPATI.,, REP BY ITS PROPRIETOR D. SUBRAMANYAM REDDY S/O. D.CHINNABBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT:43 YEARS, 14-3-306/B- 5, D.R.MAHAL ROAD, STV NAGAR, TIRUPATI. ...PETITIONER AND 1. AP STATE FINANCE CORP TIRUPATI ANR REP PP, REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR HAVING BRANCH OFFICE AT TIRUPATI. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this Memorandum of Criminal Revision Case against the Criminal Appeal No.233/2014 dated.02.08.2017 on the file of III Additional Sessions Judge, at Tirupati as confirmed the judgement in STC No.261/2011 on the file of III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class at Tirupati on the following among other; IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 3611 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order or order to suspend the execution of sentence and release the petitioner on bail of judgment 2 dated.02.08.2017 in Crl Appeal No.233/2014 on the file of III Addl. Sessions Judge, Tirupati and Judgment dated.05.11.2014 in C.C. No.261/2011 on the file of III Addl Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupati and enlarge the petitioner on bail pending disposal of above criminal revision case, in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K B RAMANNA DORA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 2. G R SUDHAKAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2244 of 2017 ORDER: Heard Sri K.B.Ramanna Dora, learned counsel for the revision petitioner and Sri G.R.Sudhakar, learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent/complainant-A.P.State Finance Corporation, Tirupati. 02. The present Criminal Revision Case is filed, aggrieved by the judgment dated 02.08.2017 passed by the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Tirupati, in Criminal Appeal No.233 of 2014, confirming the judgment dated 05.11.2014 passed by the learned III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupati, in STC No.261 of 2011. 03. The learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent would submit that a letter dated 07.11.2025 is received from the 1st respondent/complainant intimating that the revision petitioner/accused paid the amount under One Time Settlement (OTS) Scheme, and therefore, the 1st respondent/complainant has no objection to allow the revision. The letter received by the learned Standing Counsel from the 1st respondent/complainant dated 07.11.2025 is placed on record. 04. Sri K.B.Ramanna Dora, learned counsel for the revision petitioner would submit that in the light of submission made by the 4 learned Standing Counsel for the 1st respondent/APSFC, Tirupati revision may be allowed and the judgment dated 05.11.2014 passed in STC No.261 of 2011 by the learned III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupati, may be set aside. 05. Considering the above submissions made by both sides, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed, setting aside the judgment dated 02.08.2017 passed by the learned III Additional Sessions Judge, Tirupati, in Criminal Appeal No.233 of 2014 and also judgment dated 05.11.2014 passed by the learned III Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Tirupati, in STC No.261 of 2011, acquitting the revision petitioner for the offence U/s.138 read with Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The fine amount if any paid by the revision petitioner shall be refunded to the revision petitioner in accordance with law. The bail bonds executed by the revision petitioner shall stand cancelled. 06. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is allowed. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Criminal Revision Case shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 21st January, 2026 cbn/psk 5 87 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2244 of 2017 21st January, 2026 cbn/psk