Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21321 (AP)

D. VIJAYASEKHAR REDDY v. PRL. SECY., H.E. DEPT. & 3 ORS.

WP/34124/2017 · 2026-02-12

Maheswara Rao Kuncheam

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010271562017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] FRIDAY,THE THIRTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 34124/2017 Between: 1. D. VIJAYASEKHAR REDDY, S/O. D.KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC: PART-TIME LECTURER IN ZOOLOGY, V.R. (DAY) COLLEGE, NELLORE, SPSR NELLORE DIST, H.NO.16-11-427, 2ND LANE, HARANADHAPURAM, NELLORE- 524003, S.P.S.R NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PRL SECY H E DEPT 3 ORS, SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, PRASADAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DIST. 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT WOMENS' DEGREE COLLEGE COMPOUND, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. V R DAY COLLEGE NELLORE S P S R NELLORE DISTRICT, REP., BY ITS SECRETARY & CORRESPONDENT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No.4 in furnishing the service particulars to the respondents No.2 & 3 as has been called for through the proceedings in Rc.No.803/Admin-II-1/2012, dated 16- 09-2016 in pro-forma annexed to it, issued by the respondent No.2 for regularisation of the services of the petitioner in the Department of Zoology as arbitrary, illegal and voilative of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Article 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.4 to furnish the service particulars of the petitioner to the respondents No.2 & 3 in the pro-forma annexed to the Proceedings in Rc.No.803/Admin-II-1/2012, dated 16-09-2016 to the respondent No.2 forthwith for regularisation of the services of the petitioner in the Department of Zoology of the 4th respondent College and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 42435 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 to furnish the service particulars of the petitioner to the respondents No.2 & 3 in the pro-forma annexed to the Proceedings in Rc.No.803/Admin-II-1/2012, dated 1609-2016 to the respondent No.2 forthwith, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G RAMESH BABU 2. GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 34124/2017 ORDER:- The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of Constitution of India seeking the following main prayer: “to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondent No.4 in furnishing the service particulars to the respondents Nos.2 and 3 has been called for through the proceedings in Rc.No.803/Admin-II- 1/2012, dated 16.09.2016 in pro-forma annexed to it, issued by the respondent No.2 for regularisation of the services of the petitioner in the Department of Zoology as arbitrary illegal and voilative of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.4 to furnish the service particulars of the petitioner to the respondents Nos.2 and 3 in the proforma annexed to the Proceedings in Rc.No.803/Admin- II-1/2012, dated 16.09.2016 to the respondent No.2 forthwith for regularisation of the services of the petitioner in the Department of Zoology of the 4th respondent College and pass such other order or orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case” 2. On 31.01.2026, this Court passed the following order: “No representation for the petitioner. List the matter next week under the caption „For dismissal‟.” 3. On 05.02.2026, this Court passed the following order: “Sk.Ameenuddin, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner(s) submits that the instant lis is connected to W.P.No.34132 of 2017. 4 Hence, list along with W.P.No.34132 of 2017 next week under the same caption.” 4. Today, when the matter is taken-up for hearing, no representation for the petitioner even though the matter is listed under the caption „for dismissal‟. 5. Mr. V.Adinarayana, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing Mr.Rama Chandra Rao Gurram, learned Government Pleader for Higher Education, brought to the notice of this Court that the very same petitioner has instituted W.P. No.33406 of 2018 with the very same prayer, arraying the respondents herein. 6. Thus, taking into consideration the subsequent events involved in the lis, coupled with the fact that there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. It is needless to state that this order shall not prejudice the rights of the petitioner to pursue the case in W.P. No. 33406 of 2018, which is stated to be pending. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 13.02.2026 S D P 5 69 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 34124/2017 13.02.2026 W S D P