Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA
Ex. Pet No.126 of 2026
Decided on: 01.09.2026 _________________________________________________________________ Pawan Kumar
....Petitioner
Versus State of HP and Anr
…Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram
Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua
1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Bonit Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. A.K.Gupta, Advocate.
For the respondents: Mr.Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General.
Mr. Dinesh Sharma, Joint Director (Technical Education) and Mr. Neeraj Uppal, Principal Govt. Polytechnic Sundarnagar, present in person.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge
Following order was passed in the matter on 17.08.2026:-
“Despite grant of final opportunity under order dated 10.04.2026, the judgment in question has still not been implemented.
Learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 14.08.2026 from the
1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
- 2 - Director Technical Education, Vocational & Industrial Training, Himachal Pradesh, Sundernagar, conveying institution of LPA No.218 of 2026 against the judgment sought to be enforced in the present execution petition.
Since the judgment in question has not been implemented despite grant of final opportunity, at the request of learned Additional Advocate General, by way of indulgence, the matter is adjourned to 01.09.2026 for the purpose of implementation of the judgment in letter & spirit, failing which the respondents shall remain present in the Court on the date fixed.”
2.
Pursuant to above, learned Additional Advocate General has placed on record office instructions dated 31.08.2026 from the Director, Technical Education, Vocational & Industrial Training, Himachal Pradesh, Sundarnagar, conveying passing of order dated 31.08.2026, deciding the case of the petitioner.
3.
Learned Additional Advocate General on the basis of instructions imparted to him by the official present in the Court has submitted that consequential action based upon the aforesaid order shall be taken within four weeks.
4.
Taking note of above documents and submissions, present execution petition to stand disposed of. Liberty, however, is reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for the redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in
- 3 - accordance with law.
Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of.
Jyotsna Rewal Dua
Judge September 1, 2026 R.Atal