Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21315 (AP)

N NARASIMHA REDDY v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/14096/2025 · 2026-02-09

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010279242025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 14096/2025 Between: 1. N NARASIMHA REDDY, S/O MUNI REDDY, AGE 77, YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 19-7-79, H-3, GOPALARAJU COLONY, TIRUPATI. TIRUPATI DISTRICT. BEING REP.BY HIS G.P.A HOLDER P. LINGA MURTHY, S/O ANKIREDDY, 68 YEARS, R/O DOOR NO. 9- 505,LINGESWARA NAGAR, SAL NAGAR GRAMAPANCHAYAT,TIRUPATHI RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (ENDOWMENTS) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS DEPARTMENT, A.P., GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA, NTR (OLD KRISHNA) DISTRICT. 3. S SRI SWAMYHATHIRAMJI MATT, TIRUPATI REP. BY ITS FIT PERSON, D.NO. 122, GANDHI ROAD, TIRUPATI TOWN TIRUPATI (OLD CHITTOOR) DISTRICT. 4. SRI PARAKALA SWAMY MUTT, MYSURU, REP BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY M.CHAKRADHAR CHOWDARY, S/O LATE M.KUPPASWAMY NAIDU, AGED 59 YEARS, R/AT PLOT NO.44, D.NO.2-59, ROAD NO.3, M.K.NAIDU COLONY, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. R4 IS IMPLEADED AS 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.14096 of 2025 PER THE COURT'S ORDER DT.04.08.2025 IN I.A.NO.02 OF 2025. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P L NARASIMHA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T VENU GOPAL SC FOR ENDOWMENTS (RAYALASEEMA REGION) 2. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS 3. ADARSHITHA KILARU 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.14096 of 2025 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent submits that after filing the counter affidavit, the modified order was passed by this Court dated 19.08.2025. Now that the learned counsel for the petitioner is seeking for withdrawal of the writ petition, for which he addressed a letter dated 29.01.2026 to the Registrar (Judicial). 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim orders if any passed earlier are deemed to have been vacated and they shall be treated as non-est. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 10.02.2026 PGT