Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2131 (RAJ)

NIZAR MOHAMMAD ALIAS DHAKAD, SON OF FAJJAR ALIAS FAZRU v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/4874/2026 · 2026-04-13

Pramil Kumar Mathur

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:15324] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4874/2026 Nizar Mohammad Alias Dhakad Son Of Fajjar Alias Fazru, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of Sadan Ka Vas (Lalpur), Police Station Kama, District Deeg (Rajasthan). (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 13/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.258/2014 registered at Police Station Kama, District Bharatpur for offences under Sections 379, 411, 420, 467 and 468 of IPC. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that the allegation against the present petitioner pertains to the theft of a motorcycle as well as alteration of the same. The petitioner has been in custody since 25.02.2026. Though four criminal antecedents have been reported against him but he has been granted bail in all such cases. The present case is exclusively triable by the Magistrate. The trial of the case will take [2026:RJ-JP:15324] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4874/2026] considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Nizar Mohammad Alias Dhakad Son Of Fajjar Alias Fazru, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/23