Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.8138 of 2026
CORAM:
JUSTICE SASHIKANTA MISHRA
ORDER 06.04.2026
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the alleged refusal of the Tahasildar, Chandbali to accept the mutation application proposed to be submitted by him for mutation of land. No reasons have been indicated. In fact, the application itself appears to have not been accepted.
3. This Court has time and again held that the Tahasildar being a functionary under the statute cannot refuse to accept the mutation application submitted for mutation of land. Though, the decision whether to mutate it or not can be taken by him.
4. In such view of the matter, the writ application is disposed of directing the Tahasildar, Chandbali to accept the mutation application proposed to be submitted by the petitioner and consider the same in accordance with law.
5. The writ petition is disposed of.
(Sashikanta Mishra) Judge Puspanjali Jagannath Barik & Others .… Petitioners Represented by
Mr. R. Mohanty, Advocate -Versus- State of Odisha & Others .… Opp. Parties Represented by
Mr. S.S. Routray, Additional Standing Counsel
Order No.
01. . Designation: Junior Stenographer Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack.