Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2131 (KAR)

SRI S.M. RAVIRAJ HEBBAR v. SMT SREEMATHI HEBBAR SINCE DEAD

RFA/923/2013 · 2026-03-17

Jayant Banerji, Rajesh Rai K

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15817-DB RFA No. 923 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 923 OF 2013 (PAR) BETWEEN: SRI S.M. RAVIRAJ HEBBAR S/O LATE S.K. MANAJAPPA HEBBAR, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O KAIMARA, POST: UNTOORKATTE, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577 432. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. A. KESHAVA BHAT, ADVOCATE) AND: SMT. SREEMATHI HEBBAR SINCE DEAD 1. SRI. S.M. SHASHIDHARA HEBBAR S/O S.K. MANJAPPA HEBBAR, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, ISHA FOUNDATION, NO.15, GOVINDASAMI NAIDU LAYOUT, SINGALLUR, COIMBATTUR, TAMIL NADU. 2. SRI. RAJAN HEBBAR S/O SRI S.M. RAVIRAJ HEBBAR, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, 3. SRI. SUDARSHAN HEBBAR S/O SRI. S.M. RAVIRAJ HEBBAR, Digitally signed by PANKAJA S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15817-DB RFA No. 923 of 2013 AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, BY GUARDIAN MOTHER SMT. JYOTHI R. HEBBAR, W/O SRI S.M. RAVIRAJA HEBBAR, R/O. KAIMARA, UNTOORKATTE POST, THIRTHAHALLI TALUK SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT-577 432. 4. SMT. CHANDRIKA AITHAL W/O DR. VASUDEVA AITHAL, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, SENIOR SPECIALIST, DEPARTMENT OF ORTHOPAAEDICS, RIZWA HOSPITAL, P.B. NO.31, RIZWA POSTAL CODE NO. 611, SULTANET OF OMAN. 5. SHAIK AHAMED S/O SRI. IBRAHIM, AGED MAJOR, PWD CONTRACTOR, BALEBYLU-577 432 THIRTHAHALLI TOWN. 6. DR. VIKRAM HEBBAR S/O S.K. MANJAPPA HEBBAR, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, MEDICAL OFFICER-575 001 MANGALORE. RESPONDENT NO.6 SINCE DEAD BY LR'S 6(A) SMT. GEETHA V HEBBAR W/O OF LATE VIKRAM HEBBAR AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS 6(B) PADMINI HEBBAR D/O OF LATE VIKRAM HEBBAR AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS 6(C) VISHARUTH HEBBAR S/O OF LATE VIKRAM HEBBAR AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15817-DB RFA No. 923 of 2013 6(D) PRAJHNA HEBBAR D/O OF LATE VIKRAM HEBBAR AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS SINCE SHE IS MINOR REPRESENTED BY HER MOTHER SMT. GEETHA V. HEBBAR PROPOSED RESPONDENTS R6(A) TO R6(D) ALL ARE RESIDING AT DOOR NO.105 LAKSHMINAGAR APARTMENT P V S CIRCLE KODIABAIL MANGALORE (T), DAKSHINA KANNADA KARNATAKA. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. NIKHIL K.N., ADVOCATE FOR SRI. O. SHIVARAM BHAT, ADVOCATE FOR R2; (R3 MINOR REPRESENTED BY R2); SRI. G.S. VENKATA SUBBARAO, ADVOCATE FOR R4; SRI S.V. PRAKASH, ADVOCATE FOR C/R5; R1. R6(A), R6(B) ARE SERVED; V/O DATED 20.09.2018, NOTICE TO R6(C) IS HELD SUFFICIENT; (R6(D)) MINOR REP. BY R6(A)) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER 41 RULES 1 TO 5 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 21.02.2013 PASSED IN O.S.187/1999 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, SHIMOGA, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI and HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH RAI K - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15817-DB RFA No. 923 of 2013 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI) Heard Sri. A. Keshava Bhat, learned counsel appearing for the appellant, Sri. Nikhil K.N., learned counsel appearing for Sri.O. Shivaram Bhat, learned counsel for respondent No.2, Sri. G.S. Venkata Subbarao, learned counsel for respondent No.4 and Sri.S.V. Prakash, learned counsel for respondent No.5. 2. After arguing for sometime Sri. A. Keshava Bhat, learned counsel for the appellant states that he does not press this appeal. 3. The appeal is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. SD/- (JAYANT BANERJI) JUDGE SD/- (RAJESH RAI K) JUDGE CR/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0