Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21307 (KAR)

MRS. GIRIDHAR RAO ANITHA v. THE AUTHORISED OFFICER

WP/12486/2025 · 2026-06-12

Jyoti M

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28493 WP No. 12486 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI M WRIT PETITION NO. 12486 OF 2025 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: MRS. GIRIDHAR RAO ANITHA, W/O. SATISH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, R/O. NO.190, 1ST N BLOCK, 19TH C MAIN, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU-560010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMEER S.N., ADVOCATE) AND: THE AUTHORISED OFFICER, LIC HFL LIC HOUSING FINANCE LTD., NO.15/1, HAYES CENTRE, HAYES ROAD, BENGALURU-560025. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. SIVA BASAVA S.GHANTE, ADVOCATE FOR C/R) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28493 WP No. 12486 of 2025 ORAL ORDER Sri.Sameer S.N., counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Siva Basava C., counsel for caveator / respondent appeared in person. 2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition may be dismissed as withdrawn. When queried, counsel for the petitioner submits that a conscious decision is taken about the withdrawal of the petition and if an order is passed the petitioner shall not seek review of the order or modification of the order. 3. The oral submission is placed on record. 4. As the counsel on record has taken a conscious decision about the withdrawal of the petition, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Because of dismissal of the Writ Petition, all pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI M) JUDGE SS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19