Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21299 (CAL)

THE HONBLE COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. KARIM SEKH

CRR/1079/2025 · 2026-05-19

Arijit Banerjee, Prasenjit Biswas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

01. 19.05.2026 Court No.8 (Tanmoy) IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION CRR/1079/2025 THE HONBLE COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION VS KARIM SEKH In CRM (NDPS)/180/2025 KARIM SEKH VS STATE OF WEST BENGAL Mr. Md. Wasim Akram …for the petitioner. Dictated by Arijit Banerjee, J. 1. We had issued a Rule on March 3, 2025, calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why the bail obtained by him from the learned Trial Court by suppressing the fact of pendency of the bail application before us, should not be cancelled. 2. The petitioner filed his response to the Rule in the form of an affidavit on March 10, 2025. 3. Today, the State is not represented. However, learned Advocate for the petitioner produces Order No.18 dated December 20, 2025, passed by the learned Judge, Special Court, 4th Court, Malda, in NDPS Case No.103/2024. Let the same be taken on record. By the said order, the learned Court has discharged all 2 the three accused persons including the present petitioner. The order reads as follows:- “Today is fixed for appearance of the D/C and the IO. Accused persons namely Nazimul Hossain, karim Sekh and Ataul Sk who are on CB are present by filing hazira. Two separate petitions has been filed for discharging the accused persons. The IO has submitted FRMF. The defacto Compliainant ASI Bapi Singha of Baishnabnagar presently posted has appeared before the court in person. The defecto complainant after having appeared submits that he has no objection if the case is disposed of in terms of the Final Report Mistake of Fact submitted by the IO. In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this court is of the view that the instant case may not be proceeded further and consequently the accused persons namely Nazimul Hossain, karim Sekh and Ataul Sk and accordingly they are discharged u/sec 227 of Cr.P.C. from this case and from for their respective bail bond. The "Seized alamat ", if any in this case be confiscated to the state and destroyed in accordance with law after the expiry of period of appeal only in case of no appeal being filed. Accordingly, the instant case is hereby dropped. BC to note in the CIS and in the relevant register.” 4. In view of the aforesaid, the present proceeding becomes infructuous. The Rule stands discharged. CRR/1079/2025 stands disposed of. 5. Criminal Section is directed to supply urgent photostat certified copies of this order to the parties, if applied for, upon compliance of all necessary formalities. (Prasenjit Biswas, J.) (Arijit Banerjee, J.)