1 2026:CGHC:23717 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 395 of 2022 Arvind Dadhich S/o Late Hanuman Prasad, Aged About 42 Years R/o Sadar Bazar Bhatapara District Balodabazar - Bhatapara Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector Balodabazar- Bhatapara District Balodabazar -Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 2 - Sub-Divisional Officer-Cum-Registrar (Public Trust), Balodabazar Bhatapara, District-Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 3 - Vinod Kumar Agrawal S/o Banshilal Agrawal Aged About 55 Years At Present President, Shri Gopalji Panchayati Mandir R/o Civil Lines, KK Ward, Bhatapara, District-Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh 4 - Sandeep Bhattar S/o Nandkishore Bhattar Aged About 50 Years, at Present Secretary, Shri Gopalji Panchayati Mandir, R/o In Front Of Jain Mandir, Sadar Bazar Bhatapara, District-Balodabazar-Bhatapara Chhattisgarh SHYNA AJAY Digitally signed by SHYNA AJAY Date: 2026.06.16 11:02:17 +0530 2 5 - Satya Narayan Joshi S/o Radhe Mohan Joshi Aged About 58 Years, At Present Treasurer, Shri Gopalji Panchayati Mandir, R/o Sanjay Ward, Bhatapara, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara (CG) ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title downloaded from CIS Periphery) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shobhit Koshta, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shobhit Mishra, Dy. AG and Mr. Abhishek Chand Gupta, Panel Lawyer SB: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 15/06/2026 1. Heard. 2. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs : 10.1 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set-aside the impugned order dated 2/11/21 (Annexure P-5) passed by the respondent no. 2 period in the interest of justice. 10.2 This Hon'ble Court may also be further pleased to issue appropriate writ and direct that the object of the trust be fulfilled and the respondents be restrained from misusing the trust property and of the accounts of the trust and the trust management be directed under the supervision of the Registrar Public Trust and seize the illegal bank account prepared in the name of trust by the respondents. 10.3 This Hon'ble Court may also be further pleased to issue appropriate writ and direct that 3 the appointment of respondent no. 3 to 5 and other working trustee as illegal, contrary to bye laws of the trust and thus direct for their removal in respect of management of the trust property. 10.4 This Hon'ble Court may also be further pleased to issue appropriate writ and direct that the entire supervision and management of the trust be taken away from the respondents and present working trustee and new working trustee be appointed in accordance with bye laws of the trust and petitioner be considered for position of trustee being a legal representative of the author of the trust. 10.5 This Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records of the court below, for kind perusal of this Hon'ble Court. 10.6 This Hon'ble Court may also be pleased to grant the cost of the petition to the petitioners. 10.7 Any other relief which this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper may also kindly be granted to the petitioners in the interest of justice. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the subject application filed by the petitioner was not taken into consideration only for the reason that according to the authorities concerned, WPC No.4051/2021 was pending consideration before this Court. Now, WPC No.4051/2021 has already been disposed of vide order 23.4.2026 and as such, there is no impediment before the concerned Court to consider the same in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner may be granted liberty to file an appropriate application placing all these facts before the concerned Court and a direction may be 4 issued to the concerned Court to decide the same in accordance with law. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it appropriate to dispose of this petition with liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application disclosing all relevant facts before the concerned Court. On filing of such an application by the petitioner, the concerned Court is directed to consider and decide the same in accordance with law. Ordered accordingly. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the concerned Court shall decide the matter, on its own merits, in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the Petition is finally disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Shyna Ajay