CRWP-4622 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 166 LOVEMEET SINGH STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTA directions to the respondents No. 2. the petitione P-3) before the respondent No. stipulated time. 3. 4622-2026 (O&M) 8587 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH LOVEMEET SINGH & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Mr. Nirmal Singh, Advocate for Mr. Satbir Singh Goripuria, DAG Haryana PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 to the respondents No.4 and 5. The learned counsel representing the petitioner the petitioners have filed the representation ) before the respondent No.2. The learned counsel prays for directions to respondent No.2 to decide the aboveme stipulated time. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-4622-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 21.04.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH , Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Satbir Singh Goripuria, DAG Haryana. as been filed by the petitioners to protect their life and liberty from sel representing the petitioners submits that representation dated 21.04.2026 (Annexure earned counsel prays for directions to to decide the abovementioned representation within the to respondents No.1 to 3. (O&M) 2026 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS for from submits that (Annexure earned counsel prays for directions to ntioned representation within the GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.21 19:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-4622 State is hereby dispensed with. 5. hereby disposed of with a direction to the representation of the petitioner within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 4622-2026 (O&M) 8587 Mr. Satbir Singh Goripuria, DAG is hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police y of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No 2 Mr. Satbir Singh Goripuria, DAG Haryana Hence service of notice upon the Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-3) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police y of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. :Yes/No : Yes/No upon the Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is respondent No.2 to decide the ) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police y of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on GAURAV THAKUR 2026.04.21 19:03 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document