[2026:RJ-JP:1065] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17161/2025 1. Bhagwan Singh S/o Ramsingh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Chhatarganj, Police Station Nahargarh, District Baran (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail Baran) 2. Arvind @ Monu S/o Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Chhatarganj, Police Station Nahargarh, District Baran (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail Baran) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jagdish Nagar For Respondent(s) : Ms. Aarti Sharma, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 12/01/2026 1. The petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.147/2025 registered with the Police Station Nahargarh (Baran), District Baran for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 110, 352 & 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case with false and fabricated facts. Learned counsel further submits that none of the injuries, which are said to have been sustained by the complainant party, has been opined to be dangerous to life. He also submits that the alleged incident has taken place all of a [2026:RJ-JP:1065] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-17161/2025] sudden because of some dispute over the agricultural field and both the parties are members of the same family. He further submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 04.12.2025 and the police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet against the petitioners for offence punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 117(2), 110, 352 & 3(5) of B.N.S., 2023. It is also submitted by learned counsel that since the injuries sustained by the injured complainant party are by a blunt weapon, which show that the accused-petitioners have no such intention of causing any grievous injury. It is also submitted that there are cross cases in between the parties and trial of the case will take its own time, therefore, the accused- petitioners may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that one of the injured from the complainant side has sustained grievous injury on parietal region. 4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and taking into consideration the fact that the accused-petitioners are in custody since 04.12.2025 and police after completion of investigation has submitted charge- sheet in the matter and there are cross cases in between the parties, who are the family members of same family, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. [2026:RJ-JP:1065] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-17161/2025] 6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /77