Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21283 (CHH)

VIJAY LAKSHMI KHUNTE v. SANDEEP KASHYAP

CONT/686/2026 · 2026-06-15

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

Contempt Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:24007 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CONT No. 686 of 2026 1 - Vijay Lakshmi Khunte D/o Late Manohar Lal Khunte Aged About 56 Years R/o P.O. And Tahsil Malkharauda, Distt. Sakti, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Sandeep Kashyap Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Malkharauda, Jaijaipur, Distt. Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Vasu Jain Chief Executive Officer, Sakti, Distt. Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Malay Dhurandhar Project Officer, Ekikrit Bal Vikas Pariyojna, Malkharauda, Distt. Sakti, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Sudhakar Bodle District Program Officer, Department Of Women And Child Development, Malkharauda, Distt. Sakti, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Senior Advocate with Mr. Atul Kesharwani, Advocate. For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Ghanshyam Kashyap, Advocate. For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Ankur Diwan, Advocate. Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 16/06/2026 1. The present contempt petition has been filed alleging defiance of the order dated 22/04/2026 passed by this Court in WPS AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2026.06.16 16:53:27 +0530 2 No.3486/2026. 2. At the very outset by placing a copy of the order, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.3 would submit that today, the petitioner has been permitted to join the duties of Anganbadi Worker, as per the orders passed by this Court on 22/04/2026 in WPS No.3486/2026. 3. At this stage, learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that albeit the order passed by this Court in the month of April, 2026, but the same has been complied with today itself i.e. after lapse of about two months, therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to approach the appropriate authority in respect of the salary for the period when the order of termination was stayed by this Court. 4. In view of the above, the contempt petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty as prayed for by the petitioner. 5. The rule is discharged. SD/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) Judge Gowri/ Amardeep