APHC010282282015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1838/2015 Between: 1. M/S SRI VYASASRAMAM, REP.BY ITS PEETADIPATHY, SRI.PARIPOORNANANDA GIRI SWAMY. AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, R/O YERPEDU, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI GANGADHARANANDAGIRI SWAMY, S/o Sri Vijyanandhaswamy, Presently R/o Sri Krishna Geethashramam, Geethashramam Road, Proddutur Town, Kadapa District. ...CONTEMNOR Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent herein for willful violating the order dt:26-12-2013 passed in W.P.MP.No. 47513/ 2013 in W.P.No. 38220 of 2013 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2015(APPL 1155 OF 2015 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to restrain the respondent herein and his henchmen from interfering with the management and affairs of the Sri Krishna Geethashramam, Geethaashram.am. Road, Produttur, Kadapa pending disposal of the above contempt petition as otherwise the petitioner will suffer irreparable loss and injury, in the interest of Justice. 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M V S SURESH KUMAR Counsel for the Contemnor: 1. N PARAMESWARA REDDY The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1838/2015 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 26.12.2013 passed by this Court in W.P.No.38220 of 2013. 2. None appeared for the petitioner. Heard the learned counsel for the respondent. 3. Learned counsel for the respondent submits that this Court passed an interim order dated 26.12.2013 in W.P.No.38220 of 2013, which is extracted hereunder: “In view of the contents of the affidavit filed in support of this Writ Petition, which have been reiterated once again by the learned counsel for the petitioner, I consider that the ends of justice would be better served if any direction is issued to the 3rd respondent –Sri vyasashramam at Yerpedu, Chittoor District acting through its trustees to take over and manage the affairs of the 4th respondent, until further orders are passed.” 4. Learned counsel for the respondents further submits that pending the contempt case, the writ petition itself is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Since, the Writ Petition itself is dismissed as withdrawn, the contempt case cannot be enforced. 6. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. No order as to costs. 4 Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 24.02.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP 5 64 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1838/2015 24.02.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP