- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27645 RSA No. 416 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 416 OF 2017 (DEC/INJ) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. HRUSHIKESHVA SHARMA S/O. P.L. SHARMA @ LAKSHMIPATHI SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 71 YEARS, R/AT CHANDRAPURA VILLAGE, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT - 562 106 2. SRI. SRINIVASA SHARMA S/O. P L SHARMA @ LAKSHMIPATHI SHARMA, AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS, R/AT CHANDRAPURA VILLAGE, ANEKAL TALUK, BANGALORE DISTRICT - 562 106 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. RAMESH ADITHYA, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BANGALORE CITY, BANGALORE - 560 001 2. THE TAHSILDAR ANEKAL TALUK, ANEKAL - 562 106 3. KODANDARAMASWAMY TEMPLE DIETY, CHANDAPURA, REPT BY ITS ALLEGED MANAGER, HANUMANTHARAO, Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27645 RSA No. 416 of 2017 NOW DEAD AND REP BY HIS 3RD SON SRI. SURYANARAYANARAO, S/O. LATE B.H. HANUMANTHARAO, AGED ABOUT 6O YEARS, RES AT HULLAHALLI VILLAGE, CHANDAPURA, ANEKAL TALUK - 562 106 CORRECTION CARRIED OUT AND R3 DELETED AS PER ORDER OF THIS HON'BLE COURT ON 20.03.2019 4. KODANADARAMASWAMY TEMPLE REPTED BY ALLEDGED SECRETARY, P L RAMASHARMA, AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS, S/O. LATE. P L SHARMA, HAVING OFFICE NO. 14, 22ND MAIN, SBM COLONY, BANGALORE - 50 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. GEETHA M HCGP FOR R1 & R2 NOTICE TO RESPONDENT 4 IS SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED, VIDE ORDER DATED 25.06.2019 APPEAL AGAINST R3 STANDS ABATED) THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 R/W ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT & DECREE DATED 13.02.2017 PASSED IN R.A.NO 5048/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE III ADDL. DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT, SIT AT ANEKAL, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.08.2011 PASSED IN O.S.NO.2525/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, ANEKAL. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27645 RSA No. 416 of 2017 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT 1. None appears for the appellants. 2. Appellant No.1 said to have died and there is no proper steps taken to bring the legal representatives of deceased Appellant No.1. 3. Insofar as reporting the death of appellant No.2, Office has raised some objections. 4. Since both the appellants are no more, by sheer operation of law, appeal stands dismissed as abated. SD/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE SNC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4