[2026:RJ-JP:2206] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10/2026 1. Rajveer S/o Shri Balveer Gurjar, R/o Beechiya, Police Station Kotwali District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). 2. Ramvilas S/o Late Shri Hakim Singh Gurjar, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Beechiya, Police Station Kotwali District Dholpur. (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dholpur). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dushyant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP, Mr. Virendra Sharma for Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Pandey HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 19/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioners. The petitioners have been arrested in connection with FIR No.594/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Dholpur, District Dholpur for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2) and 352 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that petitioners and injured Vijay Singh & Manish are close relative. The dispute is with regards to the agricultural field, the petitioners and injured have now settled their dispute and both the injured have given a written compromise disclosing the fact that no such incident took place. The accused-petitioners are in custody since long and further trial/investigation of the case [2026:RJ-JP:2206] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10/2026] may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor have vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioners caused injuries to injured Vijay Singh & Manish and Manish sustained grievous injury at his head, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, the bail application of the accused-petitioners may be dismissed. 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the injured Vijay Singh and Manish concedes that the injured have entered into a compromise with the petitioners and if their bail application is allowed then the injured Vijay Singh and Manish have no objection. 5. Heard and perused the factual report along with the case diary. 6. It is not desirable to express anything on the merits of the case. Considering the fact that the injured have entered into a compromise with the petitioners and apart from the single injury caused to the injured Manish at his head, there are no other injuries which were grievous in nature or dangerous to life, therefore, considering the above facts, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioners namely: 1. Rajveer S/o Shri Balveer Gurjar and 2. Ramvilas S/o Late Shri Hakim Singh Gurjar, in connection with FIR No.594/2025 registered at Police Station Kotwali Dholpur, District Dholpur, shall be enlarged on bail provided they furnish a personal bond in the [2026:RJ-JP:2206] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10/2026] sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for their appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.The learned trial Judge shall also verify the address and the contact details of the surety through concerned SHO before releasing the accused-petitioner on bail. 8. The accused-petitioner No.1 Rajveer is also directed to mark his presence on 25th of every month till conclusion of trial before the concerned police station. The SHO of the concerned police station is directed to maintain a regular register marking the presence of the accused-petitioner and shall send the presence report of the accused-petitioner on the same day to the concerned Trial Court without any delay. In case of any breach to the aforementioned conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be free to move the application against the accused-petitioner for cancellation of the bail before the concerned Court. 9. The accused-petitioner No.1 Rajveer is also directed to submit his present address along with the mobile number to the concerned SHO within a period of 7 days from his release and the concerned SHO shall verify the said address and the mobile number. In case if the petitioner changes his address or mobile number, he shall submit the same before the concerned SHO so also before the concerned learned Trial Court. 10. A copy of this order shall be sent to the concerned SHO for its strict compliance. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/Rinchu/197