[2026:RJ-JP:1424] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17166/2025 Mahendra Singh Meena S/o Sh. Onkarmal Meena, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Bajava Suro Ka, Police Station Mandrela District Jhunjhunu (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Arpan Kumar Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 13/01/2026 1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 268/2025 registered at Police Station Chirawa, District Jhunjhunu for offences u/S 189(2), 126(2) & 115(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that the FIR has been lodged against unknown persons whose faces were covered at the time of incident. Counsel also submits that none of the injuries sustained by the injured- Vijay Kumar has been opined to be dangerous to life. He further submits that the accused petitioner is in custody since 28.11.2025 and he is no more required for any kind of interrogation and recovery. [2026:RJ-JP:1424] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-17166/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposed the bail application and submits that though the FIR has been lodged against unknown persons, however, on the basis of the CCTV footage and identification of the vehicle used in commission of offence, the accused petitioner has been traced out. 4. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner so also the fact that the FIR has been lodged against unknown persons and none of the injuries has been opined to be dangerous to life, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits or demerits of this case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /262