Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21269 (CHH)

SHRI OM PRAKASH BANSAL EDUCATIONAL AND SOCIAL WELFARE TRUST v. UNION OF INDIA

WPC/199/2026 · 2026-06-14

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23734-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 199 of 2026 1 - Shri Om Prakash Bansal Educational And Social Welfare Trust Through Its Authorized Signatory Shri Rakesh Mohan, Age 51 Years, S/o Shri Avtar Kishan, R/o Sakin House No. 428/as, C-1/b, Vikas Nagar Mandi Govindgad, District- Fatehgad Saheb Punjab 147301 ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Union Of India Through Its Secretary, Department Of Rural Development (Rural Skill Division), Address Ndcc Ll Building, 7th Floor, Jai Singh Road, New Delhi 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chhattisgarh State Rural Livelihoods Mission Government Of Chhattisgarh Through Mission Director, Indrawati Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chhattisgarh State Rural Livelihoods Mission Government Of Chhattisgarh Through Development Commissioner, Hall No. 38 (Block C-Iv), 1st Floor, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prasoon Agrawal, Advocate. For Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Abhishek Banjare, Advocate. For State : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Govt. Advocate. ALOK SHARMA Digitally signed by ALOK SHARMA Date: 2026.06.16 10:59:47 +0530 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 15/06 /2026 1 Heard Mr. Prasoon Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Abhishek Banjare, learned Central Government Counsel appearing for respondent No.1/Union of India, and Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, learned Govt. Advocate appearing for the respondent/State. 2 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present petition with liberty to approach the competent Civil Court for appropriate relief, as the claim regarding release of payment involves disputed questions of fact, which have also been specifically disputed in the return filed on behalf of the State. 3 Prayer is allowed. 4 Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Sd/-d/-dSd/- Sd (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Alok