1 2026:HHC:36001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA COPC No.795 of 2026 Date of Decision: 25.08.2026 ___________________________________________________ Dilbag Singh ....Petitioner Versus Er. Anju Sharma …Respondent ___________________________________________________ Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sushil Kukreja, Judge Whether approved for reporting?1 ________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Bonit Prakash, Advocate, vice Mr. A.K. Gupta, Advocate. For the respondent : Mr. B.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ________________________________________________ Sushil Kukreja, Judge (Oral) Compliance affidavit filed, wherein it has been stated that the case of the petitioner stands considered by the competent authority, vide office order dated 07.08.2026, Annexure R-1, whereby he was not found entitled for the higher contractual amount as claimed by him in his representation. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 2026:HHC:36001 2. Therefore, in this view of the matter, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition and, accordingly, the same is closed and disposed of. Notice discharged. 3. However, liberty is reserved to the petitioner to assail office order dated 07.08.2026, Annexure R-1, in accordance with law, if he is still aggrieved. The petition is disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. ( Sushil Kukreja ) August 25, 2026 Judge (V. Himalvi)