Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21264 (BOM)

RAHUL MAGANLAL JAIN @ BAGMAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

IA/2214/2026 · 2026-10-19

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

38 - CRI IA - 2214 - 2026 Rushi IN IN THE THE HIGH HIGH COURT COURT OF OF JUDICATURE JUDICATURE AT AT BOMBAY BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2214 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL BAIL APPLICATION NO. 542 OF 2026 Rahul Maganlal Jain @ Bagmar .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ....................  Mr. Pratik Kalantri a/w Renuka S., for the Applicant.  Ms. Sangeeta Phad, APP for the Respondent - State. ................... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : OCTOBER 19, 2026 P.C. : 1. Heard Mr. Kalantri, learned Advocate for Applicant and Ms. Phad, learned APP for Respondent. 2. Condition No. 2 in the bail order dated 6 May 2026 stands deleted in view of the reasons mentioned in the Interim Application, considering the fact that the applicant has a daughter to provide care and support for, and that he is the biological parent of the daughter. 3. In that view of the matter, the Interim Application is allowed. [MILIND N. JADHAV, J.] 1 of 1