Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21262 (RAJ)

KASAM KHAN S/O HARUN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/17154/2025 · 2026-01-27

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:3514] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17154/2025 Kasam Khan S/o Harun, Aged About 43 Years, R/o E-5 G-3 Bdi Ananda Jhiwana, Police Station Chaupanki, District Khairthal. Presently Residing At Khohari, Police Station Tavdu District Nuh Mewat (Haryana) (At Present Confined In Jail Kishangarh Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sanjay Khan For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 27/01/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.18/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali (Dausa), District Dausa for offence under Sections 3, 5, 8, 9 and 10 of the Rajasthan Bovine Animal (Prohibition of Slaughter and Regulation of Temporary Migration of Export) Act of 1995. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is for transporting bovine animal. He argued that nothing has been recovered from the present petitioner. The main allegation against the present petitioner is that he is registered owner of the vehicle involved in [2026:RJ-JP:3514] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-17154/2025] transporting the bovine animals. He again submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since 06.12.2025 without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Kasam Khan S/o Harun, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Bmg/139