Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010280982012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17125/2012 Between:
1. SOMARARIPATI ANIL KUMAR, S/O.VIJAYA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R. DILA. 26-4-86, VIKRAM NAGAR (V), VEDARAPOLEM, NELLORE-4, SPSR NEILORE OBIBICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. CORRESPONDENT, SRI SARVODAYA ARTS AND SCIENCE COLLEGE, NELLORE, SPSR, NELLORE DISTRICT
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, OPPOSITE TO LATA COMPLEX, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD
3. REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
4. BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION, NAMPALLI, HYDERBAD.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 1st respondents in not considering petitioner for the post of computer programmer in Sri Sarvodaya College, Nellore, SPSR Nellore District is bad, arbitrary and
2
contrary to all cannons of law and also offends Arts. 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 21960 OF 2012 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 1st respondent to consider petitioner for the existing post of computer programmer in Sri Sarvodaya College, Nellore, SPSR Nellore district pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M VIDYAVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR EDUCATION The Court made the following:
3
Order:-
The learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the respondents submits that the 1st respondent college has surrendered the aid along with the sanctioned posts and that the 1st respondent college is no longer functioning as an aided college.
2. In view of the same, the grievance of the petitioner seeking a direction to consider the petitioner for the post of Computer Programmer in the 1st respondent college cannot be considered on merits.
3. Accordingly, this writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N
05.03.2026 PNS