Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21261 (CHH)

D.P. SHARAF (IN PERSON) v. PRESIDENT AND MEMBER JUDGE

WPC/1808/2026 · 2026-06-14

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23806 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1808 of 2026 • D.P. Sharaf (In Person) S/o Late K. Anand Sharaf Aged About 69 Years 15 Block Ward No.- 13, T.P. Nagar Korba Tahsil And District Korba (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus • President And Member Judge Rashtriya Upbhokta Vivad Nivaran Pratitosh Aayog, New Delhi, Marfat- Registrar Rashtriya Upbhokta Vivad Nivaran Aayog, Upbhokta Nyay Bhawan F Block G.P.O. Complex Ina New Delhi 110023 ... Respondent (Cause title taken from Case Information System) Petitioner-in-person : Mr. D. P. Sharaf appears through V.C. For Respondent : None. Hon’ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 15/06/2026 1. Heard. 2. This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs:- “10.1 उत्तरवादी को नि दी श जार निकोया जावा निको वाह मामाले को अंनिमा रूप से से वाई कोर नि र्णया परिर कोर!। 10.2 नि दी श जार निकोया जावा निको यादिदी बें!च को पसे सेमाया ह& ह'  अंन्या बें!च को मामाले स्था रिर कोर त्कोले से वाई कोर नि र्णया परिर कोर। 10.3 अंन्या को ई आदीश/नि दी श जा मामाले को दीख हुए त्कोले न्याया ह नि दी श जार कोर  को/ को0 प कोर!।” DEEPTI JHA Digitally signed by DEEPTI JHA 2 3. Petitioner-in-person submits that the matter bearing Revision No. NC/RP/1671/2023 is pending consideration before the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at New Delhi and was listed on 27.02.2026, due to paucity of time it could not be heard and further date was given to be listed on 03.07.2026. He further submits that on several occasions matter was adjourned due to paucity of time, therefore, he seeks direction from this Court that the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission shall consider and decide the matter on merits within the stipulated period of time. 4. Considering the facts of the above submission made by the petitioner-in- person and from perusal of the order sheets dated 27.02.2026, 05.01.2026, it appears that on earlier occasion also matter could not be heard due to paucity of time. Further, on 27.02.2026, matter could not be heard and it is listed for hearing on 03.07.2026 with a direction to the parties to file their brief synopsis along with citations relied upon. 5. In view of the matter, National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission at New Delhi is directed to decide the matter expeditiously, if not possible on 03.07.2026, it shall be decided within a short span of time preferably within a period of 3 months from date of passing of this order. 6. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Interlocutory application(s), pending if any, also stands disposed of. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Deepti Jha