Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21256 (CHH)

BASANT KUMAR GHRITLAHRE v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/554/2022 · 2026-06-14

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23745 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 554 of 2022 1 - Basant Kumar Ghritlahre S/o Shivkumar Ghritlahre Aged About 44 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (L. B.) In Govt. Primary School Jaitpuri, Kawardha, District- Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 2 - Ram Kumar Sahu S/o Gangaram Sahu Aged About 52 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (L. B.) In Govt. Primary School Ningapur, Kawardha, District- Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 3 - Pitambar Singh S/o Mayaram Dhruwe Aged About 38 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (L. B.) In Govt. Primary School Ningapur, Kawardha, District- Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 4 - Tilakram Sarwa S/o Vishnu Ram Sahu Sarwa Aged About 51 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (L. B.) In Govt. Primary School Kunwamalgi, Kawardha, District- Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 5 - Abhiraj Kunwar Singh W/o Krishna Kumar Aged About 31 Years Presently Posted As Assistant Teacher (L. B.) In Govt. Primary School Kunwamalgi, Kawardha, District- Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Principal Secretary, School Education NIRMALA RAO 2 Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Directorate Of Public Instruction (D P I) Raipur District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - The Director Directorate Of Panchayat, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 6 - The District Education Officer Kawardha District- Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 7 - The Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) 8 - The Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pandariya, Kawardha, District Kabirdham (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner/s : Shri Sushil Dubey, Advocate. For Respondents/ State : Shri Abhuday Tripathi, P.L. Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Judgment On Board 15.06.2026 1) By way of this petition, the petitioners have sought following reliefs:- “10.1 It is therefore prayed that, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire records pertaining to the case of the Petitioner. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ in nature of mandamus whereby to direct the Respondent No. 1, 2 as well as No. 3 to grant the benefit of Kramonnati to the Petitioners within a stipulated time and also consider the other service benefits as like 3 seniority, time pay scale etc. accrued to the Petitioners in the interest of justice. 10.3 Any other relief/reliefs, which this Hon'ble Court may think fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, with cost of the petition, may also please be granted to the petitioner.” 2) Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners would submit that the services of the petitioners were absorbed with the School Education Department pursuant to the order dated 30.6.2018. He would submit that the petitioners are entitled for grant of an upgraded pay-scale but their claims have not been considered yet by the respondent authorities. He would submit that the petitioners may be permitted to make representations before respondent No.7 and the said authority may be directed to decide the same expeditiously within the stipulated time. 3) On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4) I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents placed on record. 5) Taking into consideration the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners, the petition is disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the petitioners to make a detailed representation before respondent No.7 within a period of 30 days and in turn, the said authority is directed to consider and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law. 4 6) With the aforesaid observation(s), and direction(s), this petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Nimmi